LLM for Qualitative SEND Data Analysis

The analysis of pupil data is critical for effective provision in UK schools, but a crucial distinction exists: quantitative data (numerical scores, attendance rates, fixed-scale behaviour charts) tells us what happened, while qualitative data (teacher observations, pastoral notes, pupil voice transcripts, open-ended surveys) provides the rich, descriptive context of why it happened. Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly becoming the most powerful AI educational tool for extracting meaningful, actionable insights from this complex, unstructured qualitative pupil data, particularly within Social, Emotional, and Mental Health (SEMH) support and broader Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND).

🔐 The Imperative for Local LLMs in UK Education

Handling deeply personal qualitative data—especially that pertaining to a child’s SEMH needs (like anxiety triggers, friendship issues, or coping strategies)—demands the highest standard of data security and GDPR compliance. This is where Local LLMs become essential.

Data Residency and GDPR: A Local LLM is deployed on-premise (on the school’s or trusted partner’s secure internal server), meaning the sensitive pupil data never leaves the local network. This directly addresses the data residency and privacy concerns associated with sending data to external, commercial cloud services.
Open-Source Infrastructure: Solutions like Ollama—which simplifies the process of running various LLMs locally—and AnythingLLM—which provides a secure, intuitive interface to chat with your documents using those local models—offer a powerful, transparent, and privacy-first infrastructure for schools.

⚖️ The Difference: Quantitative vs. Qualitative Pupil Data Analysis

Effective SEND and SEMH provision relies on both data types, but they are analysed differently:

Data Type	Nature of Data	Analysis Focus	LLM Relevance
Quantitative	Numerical (e.g., test scores, absence days, fixed-scale behaviour scores).	Statistical analysis, correlation, measuring magnitude and frequency (“How many?”).	Low. Typically handled by standard statistical software.
Qualitative	Descriptive (e.g., observation notes, pupil diary entries, free-text reports, parental feedback).	Thematic analysis, sentiment analysis, generating hypotheses, understanding context (“Why?” and “How?”).	High. LLMs excel at processing and coding large volumes of unstructured text.

Export to Sheets

While a statistical tool can tell a school that a pupil’s behaviour incidents (quantitative) increased by 10% in a month, an LLM analysing the qualitative observation notes can reveal why, identifying themes like ‘change in staffing’ or ‘peer conflict’ as the likely trigger.

💖 Analytical Applications for SEMH and Other SEND

By running a local model, staff at mainstream schools, SEMH provisions, and alternative provisions can leverage the power of advanced LLMs without risk.

Thematic Coding in SEMH: An LLM can be instructed to read thousands of daily observation notes concerning SEMH difficulties (such as anxiety, self-regulation, or low mood) and automatically assign codes, for example, “Loss of Focus,” “Refusal to Engage,” or “Positive Peer Interaction.” This reveals consistent, overarching themes that human staff might miss due to volume.
Drafting EHCP/IEP Reports: LLMs can quickly summarise a year’s worth of qualitative notes from various staff (e.g., class teacher, TA, specialist) for students with diverse SEND (including Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Dyslexia, or ADHD), drafting objective, evidence-based sections for an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP) or Individualised Education Programme (IEP).
Intervention Evaluation: By comparing the thematic analysis of notes taken before and after a specific SEMH provision (like a nurture group or targeted counselling), the LLM provides an evidence base for intervention effectiveness.

☁️ Cloud-Based Models and Developer Tools

While local LLMs offer the best security for sensitive pupil data, other powerful LLMs and related tools are being used ethically for general educational tasks, or can be used with heavily anonymised or non-sensitive data:

Google Gemini and ChatGPT: These powerful, cloud-based models excel at generating synthetic training data, summarising educational research, or providing general drafting assistance for non-pupil-specific work.
NotebookLM: An AI-first notebook developed by Google, NotebookLM allows users (including educators) to upload their own documents (like research papers or policy documents) and ask the AI to summarise, generate study guides, or brainstorm ideas using only those uploaded sources. While useful, schools must be mindful of its cloud nature if inputting any data that could potentially identify a pupil.
ChatGPT Projects: This refers to custom applications built upon the OpenAI platform, which educators may use for curriculum development or creating generic learning resources. The same data privacy caution applies.

Ultimately, the combination of advanced analytical power from models like Gemini or the underlying technology of ChatGPT, with the local security provided by platforms like Ollama and AnythingLLM, offers UK schools a robust, ethical framework for using LLMs to transform SEND and SEMH support.